On a weekend day in the year 1996, a single attacker using rapid-fire weapons took the lives of 35 people in the Australian tourist town of Port Arthur.
That horrific event nearly a generation ago, which ushered in some of the toughest weapons policies in the world, can feel like a bygone age for many residents.
However, the Bondi Beach attack this past Sunday, which resulted in 15 fatalities, has revived the ghosts of the 1996 shootings.
A analysis revealed that there are now in excess of four million privately-owned firearms across the country â a figure that is almost double the amount from two decades prior.
This translates to approximately a weapon for each small group of people.
While the state of Queensland has the most registered guns, followed by New South Wales (NSW) and the state of Victoria, it is the island state and the Northern Territory that have the greatest density of weapons.
The data also dispels the widespread belief that guns are mostly possessed by rural residents.
Weapons are widespread in urban centres, with a sizable percentage located in population centres.
Critically, there are now weapons owned by a smaller group, with the typical gun owner possessing over four firearms.
Weapons legislation in Australia are inconsistent across the country, with a mixed implementation of rules between different jurisdictions.
Generally, to obtain a gun licence, an individual must be over 18, deemed a "fit and proper person", pass a training and safety course, and provide a "genuine reason" for ownership.
The permitted justifications include hunting or culling, target or sport shooting, certain occupational requirements, and collecting.
However, significant shortcomings remain. For instance, young people in some jurisdictions can have access to a firearm from as young as 10 or 12 years old.
Following the Port Arthur massacre, a major rewrite of national gun laws was enacted, leading to a voluntary hand-in of over 650,000 firearms.
Certain types of firearms were outlawed, and security screenings alongside mandatory cooling-off periods for sales were introduced.
A key tenet of these reforms was the removal of "self-defence" as a acceptable grounds for gun ownership.
In the immediate aftermath the Bondi shooting, political leaders were forceful about the need to tighten gun laws.
A country-wide firearm surrender program was unveiled, marking the first such effort since 1996.
Other planned reforms now under consideration include:
There are also calls for regular reviews of existing licence holders, acknowledging that "situations evolve" over time.
These proposed changes have met with opposition from some quarters.
Pro-gun advocates argue that imposing caps would not have prevented an attack driven by violent beliefs.
They suggest that political capital would be better spent combating radicalisation rather than changing laws for the great bulk of licensed individuals.
Furthermore, a long-promised reform from 1996 â a centralised weapon tracking system â remains incomplete, though it has now been listed as a priority.
For campaigners, the Bondi attack is a tragic indication that regulations must evolve with changing times.
They argue that strengthening is needed to "address deficiencies" and safeguard communities.
While mass shootings remain relatively rare in Australia compared to some nations, the potential persists, and the ongoing issue of guns in the wrong hands â through poor storage â continues to pose a danger.
As one advocate reflected, "It's sad that it takes such a loss of life to get people to wake up and take notice."
Elin Àr en passionerad livsstilsbloggare som delar sina erfarenheter om heminredning, hÄllbarhet och vardagslycka.